Determining the Legal Nature of Setoff in Russian Legal Scholarship: A Historical-Legal Analysis
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2026.185.4.109-124
Abstract
The paper provides a historical and legal analysis of the institution of setoff in Russian legal science, covering three key periods: pre-revolutionary, Soviet and modern. It demonstrates the formation of three competing theoretical models: the automatic setoff theory, the theory of unilateral declaration of will, and the contractual theory of setoff. The existence of procedural and substantive approaches to the nature of offset, which developed in pre-revolutionary civil law and have survived to the present day, has been established. It has been revealed that the legal nature of setoff cannot be unambiguously reduced to either the method of terminating obligations or the form of their fulfillment. The paper substantiates the essential contradiction between the basic legal structure of setoff and the principles of bankruptcy proceedings, which has been transformed into the modern principle of equality of creditors. It is argued that the current stage of development of the institute is characterized by the increasing role of judicial interpretation and the formation of the concept of setoff as a specific form of due execution. The results of the study demonstrate the continuity of doctrinal developments under minimalist legislative regulation, as well as the need for further theoretical understanding of the dualistic nature of setoff.
About the Author
A. A. LepeshkinRussian Federation
Aleksandr A. Lepeshkin - Postgraduate Student, Department of Entrepreneurial and Corporate Law, Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL).
Moscow
References
1. Adamovich V. I. Vstrechnyy isk (k ucheniyu o zachete). — Vyp. 1. — SPb.: Tipo-lit. A. Leyferta, 1899. — 290 s.
2. Afanasev S. F. Zametki ob institutsionno-pandektnom podkhode v chastnom prave i tsivilisticheskom protsesse: istoriya i sovremennost // Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa. — 2023. — № 5. — S. 49–88.
3. Bevzenko R. S., Fakhretdinov T. R. Zachet v grazhdanskom prave: opyt issledovaniya teoreticheskoy konstruktsii i obobshcheniya sudebnoy praktiki. — M.: Statut, 2006.
4. Belov V. A. Prekrashchenie obyazatelstv zachetom vstrechnykh trebovaniy po vekselyam (na primere obyazatelstv iz kreditnykh dogovorov) // Zakonodatelstvo. — 1997. — № 1.
5. Berngeft F., Koler I. Grazhdanskoe pravo Germanii: per. s nem. — SPb.: Senat. tip., 1910.
6. Braude I. Problemy zacheta v Grazhdanskom kodekse // Pravo i zhizn. — 1924. — Kn. 10.
7. Vavin N. G. Zachet obyazatelstv. — 2-e izd. — M.: Izdatelstvo knizhnogo magazina «Pravovedenie» I. K. Golubeva, 1914. — 66 s.
8. Grazhdanskoe pravo Rossii. Obshchaya chast: kurs lektsiy / M. I. Braginskiy, V. V. Zalesskiy, N. I. Kleyn [i dr.]; otv. red. O. N. Sadikov. — M.: Yurist, 2001. — 779 s.
9. Grazhdanskoe pravo / pod red. prof. M. M. Agarkova, prof. D. M. Genkina. T. 1. — M.: Yuridicheskoe izdatelstvo NKYu SSSR, 1944. — 419 s.
10. Gulyaev A. M. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo: obzor deystvuyushchego zakonodatelstva, kassatsionnoy praktiki Pravitelstvuyushchego senata i Proekta grazhdanskogo ulozheniya: posobie k lektsiyam. — 4-e izd., peresmotr. i dop. — SPb.: Tip. M. M. Stasyulevicha, 1913. — 638 s.
11. Desyatkov V. M. Pravovye voprosy vzaimnykh raschetov v sovetskom khozyaystve: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Sverdlovsk, 1954. — 24 s.
12. Egorova M. A. Pravovoy rezhim zacheta v grazhdansko-pravovykh obyazatelstvakh. — M.: Delo, RANKhiGS, 2012.
13. Ershova I. V., Enkova E. E. Bankrotstvo khozyaystvuyushchikh subektov: uchebnik dlya bakalavrov. — M.: Prospekt, 2016. — 336 s.
14. Isaev I. A. O sushchnosti i formakh zacheta // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2005. — № 2. — S. 56–67.
15. Isachenko V. L. Russkoe grazhdanskoe sudoproizvodstvo: prakticheskoe rukovodstvo dlya studentov i nachinayushchikh yuristov: v 3 t. T. 1: Sudoproizvodstvo iskovoe. — Minsk: Tipo-lit. B. I. Solomonova, 1901. — 304 s.
16. Kazantsev A. I. Vzaimnye raschety v narodnom khozyaystve SSSR. — M.: Gosfinizdat, 1959.
17. Karelina S. A. Printsipy pravovogo regulirovaniya otnosheniy, voznikayushchikh v svyazi s nesostoyatelnostyu (bankrotstvom) dolzhnika // Predprinimatelskoe pravo. — 2008. — № 2.
18. Krasheninnikov E. A. K voprosu o «sobstvennosti na trebovanie» // Ocherki po torgovomu pravu: sbornik nauch. trudov / pod red. E. A. Krasheninnikova. — Vyp. 12. — Yaroslavl: YarGU, 2005.
19. Meyer D. I. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo: v 2 ch. Ch. 2. — M., 1997. — 453 s.
20. Novoselova L. A. Denezhnye raschety v predprinimatelskoy deyatelnosti. — M.: YurInfoR, 1996. — 160 s.
21. Pobedonostsev K. P. Kurs grazhdanskogo prava. Ch. 3: Dogovory i obyazatelstva. — SPb.: Tip. II Otd-niya S. E. I. V. Kantselyarii, 1880. — 629 s.
22. Sarbash S. V. Ispolnenie dogovornogo obyazatelstva. — M.: Statut, 2005. — 635 s.
23. Sarbash S. V. Elementarnaya dogmatika obyazatelstv: ucheb. posobie. — 3-e izd., ispr. i dop. — M.: Statut, 2020. — 436 s.
24. Sarne A. A. Prekrashchenie obyazatelstv ispolneniem: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 1950.
25. Sinayskiy V. I. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo. — M.: Statut, 2002. — 638 s.
26. Suvorov E. D. Realizatsiya printsipa ravenstva kreditorov pri ispolnenii obyazatelstva po vypolneniyu rabot i peredache ikh rezultata v sluchae nesostoyatelnosti podryadchika // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. — 2019. — № 2. — S. 129–145.
27. Sukhanov E. A. Grazhdanskoe pravo. T. 1. Polutom 1. — M.: Bek, 2003. — 783 s.
28. Tolstoy V. S. Ispolnenie obyazatelstv. — M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1973. — 206 s.
29. Tomsinov V. A. Razrabotka proekta Grazhdanskogo ulozheniya i razvitie nauki grazhdanskogo prava v Rossii v kontse XIX — nachale XX veka // Zakonodatelstvo. — 2015. — № 2. — S. 88–94; № 3. — S. 88–94; № 4. — S. 88–94; № 5. — S. 88–94.
30. Trepitsyn I. N. Grazhdanskoe pravo guberniy Tsarstva Polskogo i russkoe v svyazi s Proektom grazhdanskogo ulozheniya. Obshchaya chast obyazatelstvennogo prava / prof. I. N. Trepitsyn. — Varshava: Tipografiya Varshavskogo uchebnogo okruga, 1914. — XVII, 345 s.
31. Usoskin M. M. Organizatsiya i planirovanie kredita. — Izd. 4-e, pererab. i dop. — M.: Finansy, 1967.
32. Fakhretdinov T. R. Problemy primeneniya zacheta v grazhdanskom prave Rossii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Samara, 2006. — 183 s.
33. Tsitovich P. P. Grazhdanskiy protsess: konspekt lektsiy, chit. v Un-te sv. Vladimira ord. prof. P. P. Tsitovichem (osen. semestr 1887 g.). — Kiev: Tipo-lit. I. N. Kushnereva i Ko, 1887. — [2], II, 110 s.
34. Shershenevich G. F. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo prava. T. 2. — M., 1915. — 544 s.
Review
For citations:
Lepeshkin A.A. Determining the Legal Nature of Setoff in Russian Legal Scholarship: A Historical-Legal Analysis. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2026;21(4):109-124. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2026.185.4.109-124
JATS XML





















