Improving the Legal Regulation of Product Quality in the Modern Russian Food Market
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2026.185.4.036-047
Abstract
In connection with ensuring the country’s food security, there is presently a need to further develop the system of legal regulation governing the quality of food products in the domestic market; specifically, it is necessary to adjust regulatory practice in light of the actual scale and methods of food adulteration. The purpose of this study is to analyze and systematize the principles and directions of legal regulation of food quality in the food market. The situation in the nationwide food market and in the regional food market of the Middle Urals is examined. The necessity of strengthening both external and internal oversight of the quality of food production and distribution, amending and harmonizing existing legislation, is substantiated. A negative trend associated with the growing adulteration of food products, namely, the decline in the quality of products consumed, is identified. The need to enhance consumers’ economic and legal literacy and to develop measures for the protection of their rights is justified. The expediency of the prompt adoption of a federal law «On Environmental Culture» and an Environmental Code of the Russian Federation, with a clear definition of environmental standards applicable to the production and circulation of food products, is advanced. A more systematic study and utilization of accumulated international experience in legally counteracting the production and circulation of adulterated food products is proposed, particularly with respect to combating new technologies of food adulteration, addressing smuggling practices, mitigating the risks arising therefrom, and strengthening public and governmental oversight in the protection of the lawful rights of food consumers.
About the Authors
D. K. StozhkoUral State University of Economics
Russian Federation
Dmitriy K. Stozhko - Cand. Sci. (Philosophy), Associate Professor, Department of Creative Management and Humanities, Ural State University of Economics.
Yekaterinburg
K. P. Stozhko
Ural State Agrarian University
Russian Federation
Konstantin P. Stozhko - Dr. Sci. (History), Professor, Department of Philosophy, Ural State Agrarian University.
Yekaterinburg
B. A. Voronin
Ural State Agrarian University
Russian Federation
Boris A. Voronin - Dr. Sci. (Law), Director of the Research Institute of Agrarian and Economic Problems and Agricultural Management, Ural State Agrarian University.
Yekaterinburg
References
1. Altukhova A. A. Pravovye sredstva obespecheniya kachestva i bezopasnosti prodovolstvennykh tovarov // Voprosy rossiyskoy yustitsii. — 2023. — № 23. — S. 80–91.
2. Andreev A. V., Firsova A. P., Solominova A. R. Falsifikatsiya kachestva moloka i molochnoy produktsii kak klyuchevaya ugroza prodovolstvennoy bezopasnosti strany // Agroprodovolstvennaya ekonomika. — 2022. — № 5. — S. 32–42. — DOI: 10.54092/24122521_2022_5_32.
3. Apalkova G. D., Botvinnikova V. V. Monitoring kachestva pishchevoy produktsii: obzor sostoyaniya voprosa // Vestnik Yuzhno-Uralskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya «Pishchevye i biotekhnologii». — 2020. — № 1. — S. 5–11. — DOI: 10.14529/food200101.
4. Asylbekova N. T. Analiz konkurentosposobnosti pishchevoy promyshlennosti Respubliki Kazakhstan // Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal eksperimentalnogo obrazovaniya. — 2013. — № 8. — S. 145–150.
5. Buyarov V. S., Chervonova I. V., Buyarov A. V. Proizvodstvo yaits i myasa ptitsy v fermerskikh i priusadebnykh khozyaystvakh // Vestnik agrarnoy nauki. — 2022. — T. 9. — № 6. — S. 13–27. — DOI: 10.17238/issn2587-666X.2022.6.13.
6. Bychkova A. A. Normativno-pravovoe regulirovanie instituta kachestva i bezopasnosti pishchevykh produktov // Yuridicheskie nauki, pravovoe gosudarstvo i sovremennoe zakonodatelstvo: sbornik statey XI Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. — Penza: Nauka i prosveshchenie, 2020. — S. 95–98.
7. Vlasov V. A., Novikova A. Yu., Kochergina Yu. V. Falsifitsirovannye pishchevye produkty: ponyatie, priznaki, vidy // Agrarnoe i zemelnoe pravo. — 2020. — T. 191. — № 11. — S. 207–210. — DOI: 10.47643/1815-1329_2020_11_207.
8. Voronin B. A, Voronina Ya. V., Stozhko D. K., Stozhko K. P. Problema kodifikatsii «organicheskikh produktov pitaniya»: teoretiko-metodologicheskie aspekty sistemnogo analiza i pravovogo regulirovaniya // Agrarnyy vestnik Urala. — 2023. — T. 23. — № 5. — S. 97–107. — DOI: 10.32417/1997-4868-2023-234-05-97-107.
9. Gurinovich G. V. Osnovy zakonodatelstva i standartizatsii v pishchevoy promyshlennosti. — Kemerovo: KemGU, 2020. — 87 s.
10. Donchenko L. S. Pravovoe regulirovanie kachestva prodovolstvennoy produktsii v Rossii // Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk. — 2018. — № 9. — S. 160–163. — DOI: 10.24411/2500-1000-2018-10034.
11. Lebedev K. A., Andreev D. R. Vliyanie globalnoy konkurentsii na vnutrenniy prodovolstvennyy rynok // Upravlencheskiy uchet. — 2024. — № 3. — S. 373–387.
12. Maminev A. A. Mekhanizm gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya kachestva i bezopasnosti pishchevykh produktov // Molodoy uchenyy. — 2020. — T. 309. — № 19. — S. 330–333.
13. Matishova E. S. Pravovye mery obespecheniya kachestva i bezopasnosti pishchevykh produktov // Tamozhennoe delo. — 2016. — № 3. — S. 24–27.
14. Nikolaeva M. A., Polozhishnikova M. A. Identifikatsiya i obnaruzhenie falsifikatsii prodovolstvennykh tovarov. — M.: Infra-M, 2022. — 461 s.
15. Petrov A. N., Khanferyan R. A., Galstyan A. G. Aktualnye aspekty protivodeystviya falsifikatsii pishchevykh produktov // Voprosy pitaniya. — 2016. — № 5. — S. 86–92.
16. Radko D. S., Kolobov S. V. Problemy falsifikatsii i identifikatsii pishchevykh produktov i puti ikh preodoleniya // Tekhnologii pishchevoy i pererabatyvayushchey promyshlennosti APK — produkty zdorovogo pitaniya. — 2024. — № 2. — S. 84–91. — DOI: 10.24412/2311-6447-2024-2-84-91.
17. Skrypnik D. V., Shakleina M. V., Zaytsev A. A. Kontrsanktsii na prodovolstvennom rynke i blagosostoyanie naseleniya Rossii // Ekonomicheskaya politika. — 2024. — T. 19. — № 1. — S. 30–65. — DOI: 10.18288/1994-5124-2024-1-30-65.
18. Toropova N. V., Mekhdiev E. T., Lebedev I. A. Aktualnye problemy potrebleniya prodovolstviya: potreblenie falsifitsirovannoy i kontrafaktnoy produktsii // Ekonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. — 2019. — T. 9. — № 10-1. — S. 630–638. — DOI: 10.34670/AR.2020.91.10.071.
19. Khrundin D. V. Osnovy zakonodatelstva i standartizatsii v pishchevoy promyshlennosti. — M.: Protektor, 2017. — 815 s.
20. Chagina E. M. Vvedenie v zabluzhdenie kak forma nedobrosovestnoy konkurentsii // Pravo i politika. — 2024. — № 12. — S. 79–89. — DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2024.12.72692.
21. Sharapova V. M., Pustuev A. L., Mingalev V. D., Khmelnitskaya Z. B. Formirovanie konkurentnoy sredy na prodovolstvennom rynke // Agrarnyy vestnik Urala. — 2012. — T. 96. — № 4. — S. 103–106.
22. Evans Dzh. A. Zamorozhennye pishchevye produkty. Proizvodstvo i realizatsiya. — SPb.: Professiya, 2010. — 440 s.
23. Evershed R., Templ N. Sostav: kak nas obmanyvayut proizvoditeli produktov pitaniya. — M.: Alpina Pablisher, 2018. — 392 s.
24. A review of food fraud and food authenticity across the food supply chain, with an examination of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and Brexit on food industry / C. Brooks, L. Parr, J. M. Smith [et al.] // Food Control. — 2021. — Vol. 130. — DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108171.
25. Food Fraud Conceptualization: An Exploratory Study with Portuguese Consumers / M. J. Costa, I. Sousa, A. P. Moura [et al.] // Journal of Food Protection. — 2024. — Vol. 87. — Iss. 7. — DOI: 10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100301.
Review
For citations:
Stozhko D.K., Stozhko K.P., Voronin B.A. Improving the Legal Regulation of Product Quality in the Modern Russian Food Market. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2026;21(4):36-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2026.185.4.036-047
JATS XML





















