Protection of Court Holdings in Criminal Procedure

The article discusses the features of court holdings in criminal proceedings as acts of the judiciary reflecting its basic features. It is concluded that such properties possess separate and independent nature, situation orientation, focus, integrity, commitment, regulatory nature, enforcement nature. Court decisions rendered in criminal proceedings, all together, shall meet the requirements of the completeness of the judiciary. In other words, they shall be made in such a way that the court during the hearing of a criminal case or consideration of a case is not limited in its procedural activity and possibility to study the matter in full. Besides, it shall not be bound by the position of the parties in a criminal case, has an appropriate procedure for the judicial control at all stages of criminal proceedings. Court holdings in criminal procedure act as the means of realization of its functions at different stages of the trial. In the concentrated form, they reflect the entire criminal proceedings and reveal the logical operations of the court on establishment of the facts of the case and their legal assessment. Court holdings provide the achievement of the objectives of the criminal proceedings in each individual case, organizing the legal relationship arising between actors contributing to the protection of the rights and lawful interests of individuals and public interests in criminal proceedings.

court holding, criminal procedure, procedural act, individual legal regulation, act of the judiciary, law enforcement, procedural form, designation of criminal proceedings, court independence, impartiality of the judiciary

1. Воскобитова Л. А. Теоретические основы судебной власти. - М. : Норма, 2017. - 287 с.

2. Загайнова С. К. Судебные акты в гражданском и арбитражном процессе: теоретические и приклад ные проблемы : автореф. дис. д-ра юрид. наук. - Екатеринбург, 2008. - 50 с.

3. Лупинская П. А. Решения в уголовном судопроизводстве: их виды, содержание и формы. - М. : Юридическая литература, 1976. - 166 с.

4. Фойницкий И. Я. Курс уголовного судопроизводства. - СПб. : Альфа, 1996. - Т. 1. - 552 с.

5. Хахалева Е. А. Обоснованность решения суда общей юрисдикции : автореф. дис.. канд. юрид. наук. - Краснодар, 2005. - 26 с.