Refusal to Accept Applications and Protection of Interested Parties in Civil and Administrative Court Procedure: Some Issues
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2018.97.12.104-115
Abstract
The paper discusses some aspects of the unification of the rules of civil and administrative procedure following the example of the rules on refusal to accept a statement. From the doctrinal point of view, the problem of the relationship of these norms with the tasks and basic initial principles of the civil process is investigated. Court practice on the refusal to accept the application due to the lack of jurisdiction of the case is analyzed. Within the framework of the topic under the study, some provisions of the draft law of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on amendments to the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, the agrarian and industrial complex of the Russian Federation, the CAS of the Russian Federation are assessed. The author makes suggestions, the implementation of which will increase the effectiveness of judicial protection of interested persons, will ensure the availability of justice in civil and administrative cases and will contribute to procedural economy.
About the Author
D. A. Guziy
Kutafin Moscow Law State University (MSAL)
Russian Federation
GUZIY Dmitriy Aleksandrovich, Master’s Degree Student, Practicing Lawyer
125993, Russia, Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9
Russian Federation
GUZIY Dmitriy Aleksandrovich, Master’s Degree Student, Practicing Lawyer
125993, Russia, Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9
References
1. Abova T. E. O nekotorykh neopravdannykh raskhozhdeniyakh mezhdu APK RF i GPK RF v regulirovanii protsessual’nykh otnosheniy // Rossiyskiy ezhegodnik arbitrazhnogo i grazhdanskogo protsessa. — 2005. — № 4. — S. 43—49.
2. Aboznova O. V. Sud v mekhanizme realizatsii prava na sudebnuyu zashchitu v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse : avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Ekaterinburg, 2006. — 28 s.
3. Abushenko D. B. Otkaz v prinyatii iskovogo zayavleniya v arbitrazhnom protsesse: razmyshleniya nad protsessual’noy novelloy // Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya RF. — 2017. — № 7. — C. 71—96.
4. Alekseev S. S. Sobranie sochineniy : v 10 t. [+ Spravoch. tom]. — M. : Statut, 2010. — T. 3 : Problemy teorii prava : kurs lektsiy. — 781 s.
5. Andreeva T. K. Voprosy kompetentsii arbitrazhnykh sudov v novom Arbitrazhnom protsessual’nom kodekse Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Khozyaystvo i pravo. — 2002. — № 9. — S. 46—50 ;
6. Andreeva T. K. Podvedomstvennost’ del arbitrazhnym sudam. V: M. K. Treushnikov. Arbitrazhniy protsess : uchebnik dlya studentov yuridicheskikh vuzov i fakul’tetov. 5-e izd., pererab. i dop. — M. : Izdatel’skiy dom «Gorodets», 2016. — 704 s.
7. Andreeva T. K. Razreshite predstavit’ — noviy protsessual’niy kodeks // Vash partner — konsul’tant. — 2002. — № 30. — S. 25
8. Afanas’ev S. F. Pravo na spravedlivoe sudebnoe razbiratel’stvo i ego realizatsiya v rossiyskom grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve : monografiya / pod red.: Vikut M. A. — M. : Yurlitinform, 2009. — 296 s.
9. Bonner A. T. Nekotorye soobrazheniya po sovershenstvovaniyu deyatel’nosti arbitrazhnykh sudov // Zakon. — 2012. — № 1. — S. 56—59.
10. Blazheev V. V., Uksusova E. E. Grazhdanskiy protsess : uchebnik dlya bakalavrov. — M. : Prospekt, 2015. — 736 s.
11. Vas’kovskiy E. V. Kurs grazhdanskogo protsessa: sub”ekty i ob”ekty protsessa, protsessual’nye otnosheniya i deystviya. — M. : Statut, 2016. — 624 s.
12. Voronov A. F. Soderzhanie ekonomicheskoy deyatel’nosti // Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa. — 2017. — № 6. — S. 13—33.
13. Gordon V. M. Osnovanie iska v sostave izmeneniya iskovykh trebovaniy. Yaroslavl’: Tipografiya Gubernskogo pravleniya, 1902. — XVIII. — 316 s.
14. Gromoshina N. A. Differentsiatsiya i unifikatsiya v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve : dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. — M., 2010. — 409 s.
15. Gurvich M. A. Pravo na isk / otv. red.: Kleynman A. F. — M., L.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1949. — 216 s.
16. Zhilin G. A. Pravosudie po grazhdanskim delam: aktual’nye voprosy : monografiya. — M. : Prospekt, 2010. — 576 s.
17. Zhuykov V. M. Sudebnaya reforma: problemy dostupa k pravosudiyu. — M. : Statut, 2006. — 283 s.
18. Zhuykov V. M. Tak nazyvaemaya «optimizatsiya» — eto put’ v nikuda // Zakon. — 2018. — № 1. — S. 14—15.
19. Osipov Yu. K. Podvedomstvennost’ yuridicheskikh del : avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. — Sverdlovsk, 1974. — 36 s.
20. Osokina G. L. Grazhdanskiy protsess. Obshchaya chast’ : uchebnik. 3-e izd., pererab. M. : Norma: Infra-M, 2013. — 704 s.
21. Prikhod’ko I. A. Dostupnost’ pravosudiya v arbitrazhnom i grazhdanskom protsesse: osnovnye problemy. — SPb. : Izdatel’stvo yuridicheskogo fakul’teta S.-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2005. — 672 s.
22. Sakhnova T. V. Administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo: problemy samoidentifikatsii // Arbitrazhniy i grazhdanskiy protsess. — 2016. — № 10. — S. 45—48.
23. Sakhnova T. V. O kontseptsii grazhdanskogo protsessa i protsessual’nogo zakonodatel’stva // Sovremennaya doktrina grazhdanskogo, arbitrazhnogo protsessa i ispolnitel’nogo proizvodstva: teoriya i praktika. — Krasnodar — SPb., 2004. — S. 67—78.
24. Sultanov A. R. Pravosudie ne mozhet byt’ nemotivirovannym // Zakon. — 2018. — № 1. — S. 47—48.
25. Tumanov V. A., Entin L. M. Kommentariy k Konventsii o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod i praktike ee primeneniya. — M., 2002. — 336 s.
26. Yarkov V. V. Arbitrazhnym sudam 20 let: dostizheniya i perspektivy // Zakon. — 2012. — № 1. — S. 30—33.
Review
For citations:
Guziy D.A. Refusal to Accept Applications and Protection of Interested Parties in Civil and Administrative Court Procedure: Some Issues. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2018;(12):104-115. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2018.97.12.104-115
Views:
639
Email this article 