Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

The Legal Nature of a Utility Connection Agreement: A New Outlook at the Problem

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.121.12.190-199

Abstract

The paper continues the discussion existing in the legal literature on the legal nature of the connection agreement (utility connection) to the networks of engineering and technical support. The author gives different views on the legal nature of the connection agreement, which are found in doctrine and court practice. To reveal the essence of the contract under consideration, the author refers to the category "power" — a concept used in legislation to designate a legal relationship to endow the consumer with the right to claim against the energy supplying organization to maintain energy equipment in a state of constant readiness for the production and transmission of energy. In the course of the study of the legal nature of power, it is concluded that power is not an object of civil legal relations. The right of claim arising from the specified obligation can be attributed to such an object. The transfer of this right of claim to the consumer is made by the energy supplying organization as a result of utility connection. Based on this, the author reasonably concludes that, by its legal nature, a utility connection agreement is an agreement for the provision of services for compensation.

About the Author

M. T. Khamidullin
JSC "Tatenergo"; Kazan Federal University
Russian Federation

Marat T. Khamidullin, Head of the Legal Department; Postgraduate Student

ul. Kremlevskaya, d. 18, Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russia, 420008



References

1. Gorodov O. A. Dogovory v sfere elektroenergetiki : nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie. — M. : Volters Kluver, 2007. — 235 s.

2. Grazhdanskoe pravo : uchebnik : v 3 t. / otv. red. A. P. Sergeev, Yu. K. Tolstoj. — 6-e izd., pererab. — M. : TK Velbi, Prospekt, 2005. — T. 1. — 776 s.

3. Grazhdanskoe pravo : uchebnik : v 2 t. / pod red. B. M. Gongalo. — 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. — M. : Statut, 2017. — T. 1. — 511 s.

4. Grazhdanskoe pravo : uchebnik : v 2 t. / pod red. B. M. Gongalo. — 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. — M. : Statut, 2017. — T. 2. — 543 s.

5. Eliseev I. S. Tekhnologicheskoe prisoedinenie — pro et contra // Energetika i pravo. — 2009. — № 1. — S. 4–22.

6. Ioffe O. S. Obyazatel’stvennoe pravo. — M. : Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1975. — 880 s.

7. Kiryuhina E. V. Nekotorye voprosy pravovogo regulirovaniya dogovora tekhnologicheskogo prisoedineniya k elektricheskim setyam // Yuridicheskij mir. — 2009. — № 6. — S. 27–34.

8. Kiryuhina E. V. Elektricheskaya moshchnost’ kak osobyj tovar // Predprinimatel’skoj pravo. Specvypusk. — 2008.

9. Lahno P. G. Energeticheskoe pravo Rossijskoj Federacii : Stanovlenie i razvitie. — M. : Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 2014. — 480 s.

10. Lysenko A. N. «Moshchnost’» kak samostoyatel’nyj ob"ekt grazhdanskogo oborota // Hozyajstvo i pravo. — 2008. — № 12. — S. 43–47.

11. Matiyashchuk S. V. Kommentarij k Federal’nomu zakonu ot 26 marta 2003 g. № 35-FZ «Ob elektroenergetike» (postatejnyj). — M. : Yusticinform, 2012. — 268 s.

12. Nikol’skij S. Torgovlya moshchnost’yu — chto eto? // URL: https://www.vegaslex.ru/analytics/publications/31885/.

13. Popov P. A. Energetik obespechivaet moshchnost’, finansist — denezhnyj potok, a zakonodatel’ — fikciyu? (Kommentarij k probleme oborota «generiruyushchej moshchnosti» v energetike) // Energeticheskoe pravo. — 2009. — № 1. — S. 54–56.

14. Reclov S. O. Problemy kvalifikacii dogovora ob osushchestvlenii tekhnologicheskogo prisoedineniya k elektricheskim setyam // Hozyajstvo i pravo. — 2009. — № 2. — S. 102–105.

15. Rodionova O. M. Sootnoshenie rabot i uslug v rossijskom grazhdanskom prave i sudebnoj praktike // Civilist. — 2012. — № 3. — S. 42–46.

16. Svirkov S. A. Osnovnye problemy grazhdansko-pravovogo regulirovaniya oborota energii : monografiya. — M. : Statut, 2013. — 479 s.

17. Semenovich K. S. Dogovor tekhnologicheskogo prisoedineniya k elektricheskim setyam : dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. — SPb., 2017. — 167 s.

18. Smagin A. V. Dogovor ob osushchestvlenii tekhnologicheskogo prisoedineniya kak samostoyatel’naya sdelka v elektroenergetike: aktual’nye problemy // Energetika i pravo — 2013. — № 3. — S. 22–28.

19. Stoft S. Ekonomika energosistem. Vvedenie v proektirovanie rynkov elektroenergii : per. s angl. — M. : Mir, 2006. — 623 s.

20. Teben’kova S. A. Pravovaya priroda moshchnosti (v sfere elektroenergetiki) // Yurist. — 2014. — № 7. — S. 19–22.

21. Horosheva N. V. K voprosu o pravovoj prirode dogovora tekhnologicheskogo prisoedineniya v sfere elektrosnabzheniya // Vestnik arbitrazhnoj praktiki. — 2018. — № 2. — S. 57–66.

22. Shafir A. M. Ponyatie i pravovaya priroda moshchnosti v energetike // Biznes, menedzhment i pravo. — 2015. — № 1. — S. 45–50.

23. Yakovlev V. F. Pravovoe gosudarstvo: voprosy formirovaniya. — M. : Statut, 2012. — 488 s.


Review

For citations:


Khamidullin M.T. The Legal Nature of a Utility Connection Agreement: A New Outlook at the Problem. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2020;15(12):190-199. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.121.12.190-199

Views: 799


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)