Infrastructural Bases for Improving the Activities of the Arbitrazh Court of the Cassation in terms of Analysis and Generalization of Judicial Practice

The paper draws attention to the need for a deeper study of infrastructural conditions for the effective operation of the arbitrazh court of cassation. Based on the analysis of scientific publications, regulatory documents and problems in practical activities on the topic of the work, the author proposes three directions for its improvement for discussion. These include the following. Synchronization of law enforcement and generalization of judicial practice on the basis of scientific research methods require further improvement of the scientific qualifications of judges and court employees. Targeted collection and analysis of statistics require acquisition and study of new judicial metrics. It is important to systematize and improve the work of internal review groups (scientific advisory board, expert advisory groups, working groups, departments, etc.) and publicize the results of their recommendations in reviews, press releases and journals. The role of advanced information resources in studying the opinions of persons involved in the case and receiving feedback is also noted. According to the author, account of these components will lead to the fact that at the stage of cassation consideration of cases, judges will resolve problematic issues of substantive and procedural law and stop legal incidents more accurately, thereby minimizing errors in all parts of the judicial system. It is recommended to develop a regulation on analysis groups in the courts of cassation on issues of judicial practice, as well as on the improvement of arbitrazh legislation. The solution of intra-system infrastructure issues, which are deterrents for obtaining legal leaps, will significantly increase the effectiveness of the entire judicial sphere.

1. Bykov V. P., Chernikova E. V., Markelova I. V. Osobennosti proizvodstva v arbitrazhnom sude kassacionnoj instancii // Sovremennoe pravo. — 2021. — № 4. — S. 85–92.

2. Plotnikov D. O. Okruzhnye sudy: istoricheskie paralleli // Elektronnyj zhurnal Arbitrazhnogo suda Povolzhskogo okruga. — 2020. — № 2. — S. 4–9.

3. Reshetnikova I. V. O primenenii APK RF pri rassmotrenii del v arbitrazhnom sude kassacionnoj instancii. Novoe postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii // Zakon. — 2020. — № 7. — S. 101–108.

4. Toporov A. V., Burganov B. R. Primenenie analogii zakona pri rassmotrenii del, voznikayushchih iz administrativnyh i inyh publichnyh pravootnoshenij // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. — 2020. — № 1. — S. 140– 146.

5. Ekonomicheskoe pravosudie. Kassacionnye i apellyacionnye sudy Rossijskoj Federacii // Sudya. — 2021. — № 5.

6. Aschauer D. A. Is Public Expenditure Productive? // Journal of Monetary Economics. — 1989. — № 23. — P. 177–200.

7. Reichheld F. F. One Number You Need to Grow // Harvard Business Abstract. — 2003. — December.